Skip to main content

How Racism Persists in an "Antiracist" Society

Parallel to Native Son, Invisible Man presents racism in even more sickening racism yet Wright’s narrative does so in ever subtler ways. Invisible Man’s society is shifting toward a “post-racial” and “antiracial” mindset. However, these “liberalist” viewpoints only serve to avoid and scorn blatant racist stereotypes and not condemn actual institutional racism. Multiple instances have demonstrated this contradiction. Specifically, since the narrator’s time in the Brotherhood, in a myriad of ways this hidden racism has been shown to reveal itself with due time.
A pair of the red flags at the narrator’s first Brotherhood party also demonstrate this oxymoron of racism persisting through antiracism and post-racialism. The narrator brushes off Emma’s comment that he “should be a little blacker”, completely ignoring how she blatantly suggests the Brotherhood wants him just for the color of his skin, his race (Wright 303). Furthermore, when another brother asks the narrator “How about a spiritual, Brother?”, Jack is enraged by his antiracist principles (Wright 312). This causes that brother to be kicked out of the party. The narrator catches onto this contradiction, wondering “Shouldn’t the short man have the right to make a mistake without his motives being considered consciously or unconsciously malicious?” (Wright 314). Why should there be any consideration of race if they are “post-racial”? It’s due to the simplistic anti-racist facade that the Brotherhood paints themselves as for equality of all races. 
Right before the narrator joins the Brotherhood, he encounters the bank in his room at Mary’s. His reacts quickly with anger, “I stopped, feeling hate charging within me, then dashed over and grabbed it, suddenly as enraged by the tolerance or lack or discrimination, or whatever, that allowed Mary to keep such a self-mocking image around, as by the knocking [of the pipes].” (Wright 319). In rage toward the bank and the people knocking the pipes, he accidentally smashes the bank. Just as quickly, he’s overcome with shame and finds that he must conceal the broken pieces so Mary won’t see it. Obviously he can’t leave it in the room because Mary’s “too good of a housekeeper”, so he instead puts it within his briefcase, a symbol of his education and thus his progress. His anger is completely justified, but all he’s done to derail the racism which fueled such racial stereotypes is attack those notions themselves. 
On the other hand, he’s not at all drawn toward the thought that the conditions of a white supremacist society play have unjustly forced Mary into a position of financial struggle. When roaches come out of the steam line suddenly and frantically Mary remarks “‘Some folks just live in filth,’” (Wright 326). The steam pipes themselves plus the roaches represent the subtler, amorphous form of institutional racism, which can manifest in things as small as such and in even larger form, such as the narrator’s college life, where he must appeal to the white “trustees of consciousness” for success. Similarly, such conditions don’t faze Mary as shown by her reaction. In all cases, racism is unknowingly hiding in the shadows and thus allowed to thrive and prosper. 
The narrator’s speech at the eviction moves toward fighting the unjust white supremacist system which upholds racism, his talent for speechmaking is quickly tamed by the Brotherhood and their “scientific” approach. After the narrator further realizes the unjustness of a society in which an unarmed black man can be shot in broad daylight, he learns of the Brotherhood’s hidden biases in further absurdity. While the narrator sees a chance for real change, Hambro rebutts, “In fact, we now have to slow them down for their own good. It’s a scientific necessity” (Wright 503). They don’t care about the Harlem community, they see them as numbers and the Brotherhood is solely interested in sufficing their own white guilt by breaking down blatant racism in the form of stereotypes. The narrator’s recruitment was all along, just another method of holding back the marginalized Harlem community.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Catcher in the Rye: Holden’s Neurodivergence

  From the start it’s pretty clear to every reader that Holden Caufield is a bit different than everyone else. But why? Why does he view everyone as phony? Why doesn’t he try in school despite being smart? Why does he want to horse around so much? The answer? Holden probably has ADHD, which in the 1940s was never diagnosed in children. The fact that he’s unable to understand himself through the lenses of diagnosis definitely doesn’t help with his utter disillusionment and depression. In some respects, I saw a lot of myself in him. When most people think of ADHD they only think of hyperactivity, but other major symptoms include stuff like anxiety, daydreaming as well as many comorbid disorders like depression. One major aspect of Holden’s story is his refusal to do hardly any schoolwork and his subsequent failure at school. Holden never tries unless it’s English writing because it’s the one subject he genuinely enjoys and sees the point in. For that same reason, he’s able to wri...

The Bell Jar: Esther’s Experience with Therapy

  TW// Suicide All in all, Esther’s experience with therapy was pretty bad (not only because it was the 1940s and ECT was bad and the only option usually!) Esther’s negative experiences with Dr. Gordon definitely led her to become more suicidal. He doesn’t do ECT correctly and she never really feels comfortable talking to him so they make no progress in their sessions.  The majority of those negative experiences stem from the fact that Esther is unable to “break up” with Dr. Gordon. This is an issue even today because it’s a common misconception that you can’t leave your therapist if you feel things aren’t working with them. When reflecting on Dr. Gordon Esther says he’d “tell me why I couldn't sleep and why I couldn't read and why I couldn't eat and why everything people did seemed so silly, because they only died in the end. And then, I thought, he would help me, step by step, to be myself again” (Plath 68). She was expecting their time together to go much, much differe...

The Paradox of Madame Crommelynck

  Madame Crommelynck is certainly one of Black Swan Green’s most interesting characters. Her dialogue is metaphor and allusion laden and her impact on Jason is profound as such. However, there’s a sort of irony in how she presents herself.  One of the more notable conversations the two have is about truthfulness and beauty. Speaking to Jason about his poetry, Madame Crommelynck says “if an art is free of falseness, it is, a priori, beautiful.” She puts a huge emphasis on the fact that Jason needs to be truthful in his art. Their weekly visits are soon cut short for a shocking reason, Madame Crommelynck is arrested. Her sudden departure makes her character quite paradoxical, after all how could she hide so much if she believed in truth?  In another previous scene, she shows Jason a photograph of herself as a young girl. Jason doesn’t realize it’s her at first, Madame Crommelynck confirms it is saying “Yes. Whatever beauty is, I had it in those days. Or it had me.”...